Thursday, 9 Sep 2010
From The Wichita Eagle

Dog Gets Protection
From Wichita Judge

A Sedgwick County judge yesterday
issued a protection from abuse order
that bars a man from having any
contact with a miniature dachshund
he is accused of attacking with an ax.

The order prevents Jeffery Kwist,
48, from having contact
with "a dog named Weenie."

Kwist's bond was set at
$10,000 He faces a single
count of cruelty to animals.

Wichita police said Weenie
was attacked Saturday
afternoon in the 1500 block
of South Hydraulic.

Police said the dog was
treated at an emergency
veterinary clinic and is
recovering at home.

Read more:

http://www.kansas.com/
2010/05/25/1329832/
judge-bars-man-from-going-near.
.html#ixzz0p1sDA6tH

 


 

 

Main Menu
Home
intermission
Opinion/Columns/Letters
- - - - - - -
Local News
Regional/State
Sports
From the 'Net
Bail bond jumpers
Effort Newsletter

Be the first to find out about updates to The Effort!




Twitter Updates
    follow me on Twitter
    RSS Feeds

    rss_small

    A News Item

     

    Media Big Winner When Cash Defined as `Free Speech' | Print |
    Written by By Dwight Jurgens   
    Jan 26, 2010 at 06:19 AM
    Article Index
    Media Big Winner When Cash Defined as `Free Speech'
    Page 2
    Page 3

    ImageHUTCHINSON -- That reckless applause you heard last week in response to the Supreme Court’s lifting of rules against union and corporate campaign advertising came from the boardrooms and stockholders of those who will benefit most: television stations and newspapers. It might even save some jobs in both sectors.

    Locally, Hutchinson News Managing Editor Mary Rintoul offered an indignant editorial denouncing the decision, and I share her disdain. I don’t know whether you can literally buy an election these days, but you can bet supporters on both sides are sure as hell going to try.

    But I’ll wager her bosses at Harris Enterprises weren’t as nearly as disappointed. That’s a lot of money being put up for grabs, Those who have it and are willing to spend it call it “free speech,” and the Supreme Court agrees -- if you want to call a 5-4 decision “agreement.”

    And that means a lot of attack ads are headed our way -- the kind of stuff that will turn Super Market “exposes” into legitimate political campaign advertising. My hunch is we’re going to be teabagged unmercifully -- from the NRA, the teachers, the blue-dog Democrats and the Christian Right Wing.

    Speaking of which, let’s face it: the Teabaggers have gained some legitimacy, some power, something to boast of and flap their skinny, white wings about … or at least, that’s the perception.

    Of course, most middle-of-the-roaders kind of snickered at them before. Now they’ll get a taste of boastful, smirking Teabaggers, and they’re going to like them even less. So, who knows? Maybe the Teabaggers will self-destruct from an overdose of free-lance grinning.

    <

    The common response in the Reno County courthouse to the possibility of a bill passing the state legislature that would replace some Kansas district court judges with magistrate judges is … it probably won’t, but, yes, it could happen.

    And if it happens in Reno County? The most popular scenario has District Judge Joe McCarville moving upstairs upon Judge Dick Rome’s retirement to handle felony trials and hearings, on the assumption Chief Judge Patti Macke Dick would prefer to keep her present juvenile docket.

    McCarville’s Division 3 court would then change and go the election as a Magistrate Court, and probably changed to “Magistrate Court, Position 2” -- Judge Randy McEwen’s magistrate court is billed as “Position I.”

    Of course, this all depends on the voters putting McCarville back in for another four years, but no one yet is suggesting they want to run against him, and no one is predicting McCarville will lose if they do.

    There’s also a heavy suspicion among the lawyers in the judicial district that the robust budget cuts that necessitated the closing of some courthouse functions, hiring freezes and all-but-assured upcoming and unpaid employee furloughs … are the results of a cranky state legislature still ticked off over the State Supreme Court’s ruling on school finance several years ago. “They’ve got no love for judges of any kind right now,” offered one, non-judge attorney.

    <

    The power of the state, and its occasional foray into pointless bullying, came into play in Judge Rome’s courtroom last Friday, in the form of a request by a local attorney to get his dud hand-grenade returned to him.

    Attorney Sam Kepfield ticked off Rome and local prosecutors when he used the grenade in a failed attempt to show the jury -- which he erroneously presumed would be frightened -- how his guilty client felt when she was allegedly scared into committing forgery.

    The Attorney General’s Office determined no crime at been committed, no evidence existed that he was attempting to scare the jury into freeing his client, and rationally, it seems, declined to file charges.

    Fine, Kepfield responded, then I want my grenade back.

    The AG replied, Sorry, no. We’ve got five years to change our mind and file charges.

    Fair enough, said Rome. You don’t get it back.

    And then chewed Kepfield a new one, which, Kepfield certainly had coming. You don’t pull explosives out , even neutered ones, in courtrooms, not in this day and age. As one deputy said, if he or she had been there, “I might have shot him. I can guarantee you my gun would have come out.”

    But do you really believe the AG has ANY intent of reviewing the case at ANY point in the next five years to see if the facts have changed or if something was missed?

    Of course you don’t. This was a clear-cut act of pointless, shameless muscle-flexing by a government willing to club a citizen over the head who had done nothing illegal, simply because it could.


    User Comments

    Comment by Aggravated on 2010-01-26 08:27:53
    Went back to earlier published book "Wealth and Democracy". Personally have never been fearful of terrorism but this scares the **** out of me! Have read that some members of Congress are proposing stringent laws regulating disclosure etc (e.g. requiring approval of stockholders for ad expenditures). Since politicians seem to love signing pledges, suggest they be called on to discourage corporate et. al. funded ads. Agree that it will be difficult to expect media to "bite" the hand that will be feeding them. Sad day in America.

    Comment by Observer on 2010-01-26 08:32:20
    ...Or, is the 'muscle-flexing government' trying to protect future Reno County juries from the next defense attorney's dramatics with a gun or some other weapon. Please, try a new approach, Mr. Kepfield!!

    Comment by TRA on 2010-01-26 09:35:59
    I am not a lawyer or constitutional scholar. But I do think this is an interesting issue. I do not like the influence of unions or corporations in elections. But I do see where these campaign finance laws limit peoples rights. It has been interesting to see the right complain how this ruling will aid the unions, and the left complain that is will help the corporations. So maybe we just end up with a draw (in regards to which side has more influence) and as you note the media ad departments are the true winners.  
     
    And just curious. Is there a policy to try and use "teabagger" in as many articles on this site as possible?

    Comment by Aggravated on 2010-01-26 20:56:45
    Just to set the record straight - union membership has been on the decline for years. Union members may petition that their portion of dues NOT be used in a particular manner. Unions pull in MILLIONS - Corporations, BBBBILLIONS. This is equity? To all who still believe in universal decency of the financial sector I have two words: Bernie Madoff.

    Comment by Shocked on 2010-01-27 02:41:59
    Wait! Are you telling me that corporations and unions are now going to -- gasp! -- try and influence elections?? 
     
    Ohmigod!

    Comment by Disappointed on 2010-01-27 05:25:09
    What horrible, horrible news it is that no one is going to run against McCarville. He acts more like a cop than a judge. I sure hope some attorney around here grows a pair and does the community a favor and sends McCarville packing.

    Comment by Guest on 2010-01-27 05:27:38
    The state shouldn't have taken Kepfield's hand grenade, they should have taken his law license.

    Comment by Blue on 2010-01-27 10:37:37
    You Dims getting "tea bagged". Too funny. I'd seriously rethink using that term. 
     
    Another Dim mad about getting "tea bagged". 
     
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WS37EuiZLV8

    Comment by serious question on 2010-01-28 11:58:39
    exactly WHAT is a "tea party" or a "tea bagger"? someone please give a clear answer. thanks

    Comment by Confused again on 2010-01-29 04:47:04
    I thought the Republican party was opposed to "activist judges," who legislate from the bench. 
     
    Isn't that what was done here? Didn't the judges look at a law, decide they didn't like it, and replace it with one they did? 
     
    Isn't that the very definition of "judicial activism" that the right wing is always rallying against?